CO129-439 - Others - 1916 — Page 618

I do not see how it is possible to meet this line of argument in minute 50752. For did issue on 21st July following 23rd etc. of the trading with enemy legislation many references to examies firms substituted Swist firms Statutory Grdee. 22 of 1915 not see could how the references to ab fees therefore I do the forfeiture of the goods be upset.

As to affilication of sea. II of Andre. 22 of 1915 to on by Statutory contrany to to shipments List forms is I do international lave opinion. St simple a tile, on Customs Van not wish to to express any would howensen be perfectly int refeal it and substitute livers of rec. of rec. 2 of the Customs Abel wh. Gives the rlize any Goods! Aurfact imported in contrareention law relating Powers To 2 chat 1915 hower to wh. theng have being off the the enemy amy be tribunal.

I deprecate trading with to tale the sare thémat to arad het Azat Count amat MPLO proceedings worden before the Prize today to this franticular case any further further action Dutch Govt. naise objections five months old already. I should unless the The care There will any repetitions of it because the fove not to detain goods note loe are telling im teammit to fuims. desind that the form of from Statuting # and 613 what it is 7 ach and Sovet ray that if they wish to inve view expiry of this conness that, hivar atiplication of bac.!! it would.

Les informed we will bend the Gove thre doubts of Andre be advisable and substitute one 2 of the Customis of 1995 that Count there hee. fundimen and tell at to the 22 of 1915, to refial that sec. limes of No.2 CFL Wan Powers athet undan before a Prize that any proceedings should other love tribunal laust that tabe among mo its mo recarsity action consignment received from this particular as regards unless representations Dutch Gout.

Curl 16/11/16 I confers dont like the idea of sending out this corr; until cleared up Le have points. to as to the second third pare of the letter, I find it very